When publishers sell advertising on a CPM basis ...

When publishers sell advertising on a CPM (cost-per-thousand impressions) basis rather than on a flat-fee basis, the value of content depends solely on the amount of traffic it can draw to websites and newsletters where ads are displayed. This dynamic has reduced too much web content to the equivalent of internet-forum trolling -- provocative pieces designed to "go viral" by sparking controversy and outrage. Publishing top 10 lists that few people agree with, politically charged short video clips and other pieces of "link bait" that aim to get people to express a contrary opinion has become a viable online publishing business model. Just ask Cracked.com.

Pageviews vs engagement on content sites

Pageviews vs Engagement – Most niche sites like the idea and prestige of being published a more established player, but the partnership often does little to help keep the small site sustainable. In Technically Philly’s case, we like seeing traffic numbers grow but we know that a small but dedicated fan base is what keeps us afloat. The drive-by reader may make our Google Analytics spike, but it doesn’t help fill seats when we host a paid event. Conversely, larger sites need traffic to sell more CPM-based advertising.

This is just one point made by Sean Blanda in a post about TBD and how content partnerships "do not work."

Technically Philly values their dedicated audience because the members of that audience pay for events that the company throws. Since most large media sites make their money from CPM-based advertising, their goal is to serve more pageviews instead of servicing a small niche audience.

Very interesting. What could change that would make that part of the partnership work? Would it be more profitable for the niche site to sell ads or for the large media company to host events? Does the answer lie somewhere in the middle?

News and a killer feature

There is no such thing as a “killer feature” anymore because of extensions and plug-ins

WordPress founder Matt Mullenweg says that software has changed because killer features - those features that that used to transform a technology from an interesting novelty into a useful tool - are now added as extensions and plug-ins usually built via open APIs.

News reporting, publishing and distribution have all experienced fundamental changes. Is there a connection here?

Mobile OS: Google beat Apple by 18.5% in first 74 days

Media_httpblogflurryc_jhaqb

In the first 74 days of sales, the Droid and Nexus One - two phones that use Google's mobile operating system - sold a total of 1.185 million units. That's almost 20% more than the iPhone, which runs on Apple's mobile operating system. Those numbers were released yesterday by Flurry.

To be fair, we really should add in the number of G1, CLIQ, myTouch and umpteen other Android devices sold in the first 74 days that they were in the market. That would boost that 18.5% up considerably, I'm sure.

Google made big news more than two years ago when it announced a mobile operating system that would work with a variety of mobile service providers on phones made by a variety of device manufacturers.

Remember, the news was that a search and advertising company was creating an open mobile OS. The fact that that company ended up making its own device is really much less important.

See how Posterous transforms URLs into media

Posterous magically transforms web addresses into media. The images, sounds and videos on this page were all embedded by simply pasting the URL from the source into the Posterous edit screeen. This works with posts sent via email, too.

Clicking on the media will bring you to the original source. I've copied and pasted some of the descriptions of the videos.

If you want to see exactly what I entered to create this post please read my other post, Posterous is a magic URL machine Posterous and Wordpress are magical URL converters.

Flickr:

Twitpic:

MP3:

YouTube: Richard Edelman, CEO, and Neal Flieger, Chair, StrategyOne, presents 2010 Trust Barometer findings at an employee presentation on January 22.

Hulu: In this episode of Community, "Dean Pelton talks Jeff into becoming the new editor of the campus newspaper."

Viddler: What qualifies someone to become a Social Media Director?

Blip.tv: Craig Newmark, founder of Craigslist, spoke to students at Howard Rheingold's Stanford Digital Journalism class, 1/20/08

http://blip.tv/file/767411/

TED talks: Playing sound effects both pleasant and awful, Julian Treasure shows how sound affects us in four significant ways.

http://www.ted.com/talks/julian_treasure_the_4_ways_sound_affects_us.html

Dailymotion: Broadcast Journalist David Heathfield's report investigating the impact of citizen journalism on war.

Google Video: How Newspapers Came to Be Where They Are Today

Funny or Die: Journalism Challenge is a reality game show in which teams of two race around the world against other teams. Teams must compete in journalism themed challenges that test their news skills.

Should journalists help find links?

Media_httpgraphics8ny_ttsii

New York Times Technology reporter Nick Bilton writes "today I can’t imagine living in a world where I don’t filter, collect and share. More important, I couldn’t conceive of a world of news and information without the aid of others helping me find the relevant links."

It is clear that news organizations and professional journalists should use social media to listen and gather news and links from social channels.

It seems logical that journalists should reciprocate and help the public find useful links.

Is that where today's news organizations fit most naturally within the social media ecosystem? Sifting through information from the public and other news sources and then putting it into context that helps the community that it serves?

This sounds suspiciously similar to a core function of "traditional" journalism.

What do you think?

Murdoch's TimesOnline says "'spidering is not allowed"

There it is.

Murdock is moving ahead with his plans to block search engines from spidering his content, at least at the TimesOnline site. Here's the robots.txt file, which clearly states 'spidering is not allowed'.

##ACAP version=1.0

#Robots.txt File#Version: 0.8#Last updated: 04/01/2010#Site contents Copyright Times Newspapers Ltd#Please note our terms and conditions http://www.timesonline.co.uk/section/0,,497,00.html #Spidering is not allowed by our terms and conditions #Authorised spidering is subject to permission #For authorisation please contact us - see http://www.nisyndication.com/about_us.html

# Globally Disallowed Sections: All Robots
User-agent: *
Disallow: /_gatools/
Disallow: /_nipd/
Disallow: /images/
Disallow: /img/
Disallow: /tol/Print.do
Disallow: /tol/sitesearch.do
Disallow: /tol/incomingFeeds
Disallow: /tol/arts_and_entertainment/commercial/vip_lounge
Disallow: /tol/viewArticle.arc
Disallow: /tol/tools_and_services/rss/times_mobile_content/
Disallow: /tol/tools_and_services/mobile_times/mobile_2/
Disallow: /tol/tools_and_services/mobile_times/mobile_3/
Disallow: /tol/tlskeywordsearch.tls

#Agent Specific Disallowed Sections
User-agent: NewsNow
Disallow: /

User-agent: Omgili
Disallow: /

User-agent: WebVac
Disallow: /

User-agent: WebZip
Disallow: /

User-agent: psbot
Disallow: /

User-agent: ia_archiver
Disallow: /

ACAP-crawler: *
ACAP-disallow-crawl: /_gatools/
ACAP-disallow-crawl: /_nipd/
ACAP-disallow-crawl: /images/
ACAP-disallow-crawl: /img/
ACAP-disallow-crawl: /tol/Print.do
ACAP-disallow-crawl: /tol/arts_and_entertainment/commercial/vip_lounge
ACAP-disallow-crawl: /tol/viewArticle.arc
ACAP-disallow-crawl: /tol/tools_and_services/rss/times_mobile_content/
ACAP-disallow-crawl: /tol/tools_and_services/mobile_times/mobile_2/
ACAP-disallow-crawl: /tol/tools_and_services/mobile_times/mobile_3/

ACAP-crawler: NewsNow
ACAP-crawler: Omgili
ACAP-crawler: WebVac
ACAP-crawler: WebZip
ACAP-crawler: psbot
ACAP-crawler: ia_archiver
ACAP-disallow-crawl: /

via www.timesonline.co.uk

[pointer by The NextWeb]